<?xml version="1.0" standalone="no"?>
                    <!DOCTYPE div SYSTEM "/www/backend/www-xml-443/dtd/caidaML.dtd">
                    <!-- do NOT ERASE the DOCTYPE declaration! --><div>


<tr bgcolor="#f4f4f4">
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
<b>URL:</b>
</font>
</td>
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
<a href="http://www.usenix.org/events/sec10/tech/full_papers/Gill.pdf">http://www.usenix.org/events/sec10/tech/full_papers/Gill.pdf</a>
</font>
  </td>
</tr>


<tr bgcolor="#e9e9e9">
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
<b>Entry Date:</b>
</font>
</td>
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
2010-10-22


</font>
  </td>
</tr>


<tr bgcolor="#f4f4f4">
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
<b>Abstract :</b>
</font>
</td>
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
Many applications of IP geolocation can benefit from geolocation that is robust to adversarial clients. These include applications that limit access to online content to a specific geographic region and cloud computing, where some
organizations must ensure their virtual machines stay in an appropriate geographic region. This paper studies the applicability
of current IP geolocation techniques against an adversary who tries to subvert the techniques into returning a forged
result. We propose and evaluate attacks on both delay-based IP geolocation techniques and more advanced topology-aware
techniques. Against delay-based techniques, we find that the adversary has a clear trade-off between the accuracy and the
detectability of an attack. In contrast, we observe that more sophisticated topology-aware techniques actually fare worse
against an adversary because they give the adversary more inputs to manipulate through their use of topology and delay
information.


%
% add papers below to separate table on web page
%

</font>
  </td>
</tr>
</div>

