<?xml version="1.0" standalone="no"?>
                    <!DOCTYPE div SYSTEM "/www/backend/www-xml-443/dtd/caidaML.dtd">
                    <!-- do NOT ERASE the DOCTYPE declaration! --><div>


<tr bgcolor="#f4f4f4">
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
<b>URL:</b>
</font>
</td>
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
<a href="http://www.acm.org/sigcomm/sigcomm97/papers/p109.pdf">http://www.acm.org/sigcomm/sigcomm97/papers/p109.pdf</a><br/>
<a href="http://www.acm.org/sigcomm/sigcomm97/papers/p109.ps">http://www.acm.org/sigcomm/sigcomm97/papers/p109.ps</a>
</font>
  </td>
</tr>


<tr bgcolor="#e9e9e9">
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
<b>Entry Date:</b>
</font>
</td>
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
2003-05-14


</font>
  </td>
</tr>


<tr bgcolor="#f4f4f4">
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
<b>Abstract:</b>
</font>
</td>
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
This paper examines the network inter-domain routing information
exchanged between backbone service providers at the major U.S. public
Internet exchange points. Internet routing instability, or the rapid
fluctuation of network reachability information, is an important
problem currently facing the Internet engineering community. High
levels of network instability can lead to packet loss, increased
network latency and time to convergence. At the extreme, high levels
of routing instability have lead to the loss of internal connectivity
in wide-area, national networks. In this paper, we describe several
unexpected trends in routing instability, and examine a number of
anomalies and pathologies observed in the exchange of inter-domain
routing information. The analysis in this paper is based on data
collected from BGP routing messages generated by border routers at
five of the Internet core's public exchange points during a nine month
period. We show that the volume of these routing updates is several
orders of magnitude more than expected and that the majority of this
routing information is redundant, or pathological. Furthermore, our
analysis reveals several unexpected trends and ill-behaved systematic
properties in Internet routing. We finally posit a number of
explanations for these anomalies and evaluate their potential impact
on the Internet infrastructure.


</font>
  </td>
</tr>


<tr bgcolor="#e9e9e9">
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
<b>Datasets:</b>
</font>
</td>
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
BGP updates collected over 9 months at 5 U.S. exchange points: AADS, Mae-East,
Mae-West, PacBell, and Sprint


</font>
  </td>
</tr>


<tr bgcolor="#f4f4f4">
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
<b>Results:</b>
</font>
</td>
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
Quoting from paper with added details:
<ul>
<li>The number of BGP updates exchanged per day in the Internet core
    is one or more orders of magnitude larger than expected.
    <ul>
       <li>3-6 million updates <i>per day</i>; one peak at 30 million or more updates</li>
       <li>only 45,000 prefixes in default-free backbone tables</li>
    </ul></li>
<li>Routing information is dominated by pathological, or
    redundant updates, which may not reflect changes in
    routing policy or topology.
    <ul>
       <li>(WWDup) withdrawals of prefixes that have not been announced;
            caused by <i>stateless</i> BGP implementations</li>
       <li>(AADup) announcements of prefixes with no change in path
            attributes</li>
       <li>(WADup) route flapping: withdrawals followed by announcements
            with same path attributes</li>
    </ul></li>
<li>Instability and redundant updates exhibit a specific
    periodicity of 30 and 60 seconds.
    <ul>
       <li>perhaps due to unjittered timers, self-synchronization, interactions between IGP and BGP, or CSU link oscillation</li>
    </ul></li>
<li>Instability and redundant updates show a surprising
    correlation to network usage and exhibit corresponding
    daily and weekly cyclic trends.</li>
<li>Instability is not dominated by a small set of autonomous
    systems or routes.</li>
<li>Instability and redundant updates exhibit both strong
    high and low frequency components. Much of the high
    frequency instability is pathological.</li>
<li>Discounting policy fluctuation and pathological behavior,
    there remains a significant level of Internet forwarding instability.</li>
<li>This work has led to specific architectural and protocol
    implementation changes in commercial Internet routers
    through our collaboration with vendors.</li>
</ul>


</font>
  </td>
</tr>


<tr bgcolor="#e9e9e9">
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
<b>References:</b>
</font>
</td>
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
The most significant pathology--redundant withdrawals--was corrected in
router implementations in 1997-1998, so some of the observations are
merely of historical interest today.  The paper "Origins of Internet
Routing Instability" by the same authors is a followup to this paper.



</font>
  </td>
</tr>
</div>

