<?xml version="1.0" standalone="no"?>
                    <!DOCTYPE div SYSTEM "/www/backend/www-xml-443/dtd/caidaML.dtd">
                    <!-- do NOT ERASE the DOCTYPE declaration! --><div>


<tr bgcolor="#f4f4f4">
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
<b>URL:</b>
</font>
</td>
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
<a href="http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0405/pdf/norton.pdf">http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0405/pdf/norton.pdf</a>
</font>
  </td>
</tr>


<tr bgcolor="#e9e9e9">
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
<b>Entry Date:</b>
</font>
</td>
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
2004-06-30


</font>
  </td>
</tr>


<tr bgcolor="#f4f4f4">
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
<b>Abstract:</b>
</font>
</td>
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">

A new Internet Peering Ecosystem is rising from the
Ashes of the 1999/2000 U.S. Telecommunications
Sector crash. Global Internet Transit Providers have
gone bust and a critical broadband infrastructure
provider has failed, leaving in their wake a large set
of Internet players to fend for themselves to provide
their customers with Internet services. A broad set of
Service Providers that were once focused only on
growing their market share (at any cost) now are
bending down to shave pennies off of their cost
structure. Those who can not prove the viability of
their business model while satisfying their customer
demands are out of business.

In this paper we share research carried out over the
last four years with hundreds of Peering
Coordinators to document the recent chaotic
evolution of the Peering Ecosystem. We do this by
first defining the notion of an Internet Peering
Ecosystem as a set of autonomous Internet Regions,
each with three distinct categories set of participants.
Each of these groups of participants has their own
sets of characteristics, motivations and
corresponding behaviors and interconnection
dynamics. We describe four classes of Peering
Inclinations as articulated in Peering Policies.
The bulk of the paper however focuses on the
Evolution of the U.S. Peering Ecosystem. Several
key players, some abandoned by their service
providers, have entered into the Peering Ecosystem
and caused a significant disruption to the Ecosystem.
Peer-to-Peer application traffic has grown to
represent a significant portion of their expense. We
describe five major events and three emerging
evolutions in the Peering Ecosystem that have had
and continue to have a significant disintermediation
effect on the Tier 1 ISPs.

In the appendix we share a simple mathematical
Internet Peering Model that can be used to
demonstrate this Peering Ecosystem evolution. While
not complete or by any means precise, it does allow
us to demonstrate the affect of these disruptions in the
Peering Ecosystem.


</font>
  </td>
</tr>


<tr bgcolor="#e9e9e9">
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">
<b>Results:</b>
</font>
</td>
  <td>
<font face="helvetica,arial" size="2">

Five major events:
<ul>
<li>The 1999/2000 Economic Collapse of the Telecom Sector</li>
<li>The Growth of the Used Networking Equipment Market</li>
<li>The Upstream Proider for the Cable Companies (@Home) Went Bankrupt</li>
<li>Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Networks grow exponentially in popularity and Traffic between Access Network Providers</li>
<li>Transit Rates Drop and Transport Rates Drop</li>
</ul>

Three emerging evolutions:
<ul>
<li>The Cable Companies are Peering</li>
<li>Network Savvy Large Scale Content Companies are Peering</li>
<li>Cable Companies Peer Directly with Content Companies</li>
</ul>



</font>
  </td>
</tr>
</div>

