Transport Layer Identification of P2P Traffic

| 
|
|
Abstract for "Transport Layer Identification of P2P Traffic" authored by Thomas Karagiannis, Andre Broido, Michalis Faloutsos and kc claffy. Presented at the Internet Measurement Conference 2004 in October 2004.
| 
|

|
Transport Layer Identification of P2P Traffic
Presented at the Internet Measurement Conference 2004 in October 2004
Thomas Karagiannis
University of California, Riverside
Andre Broido
Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis - CAIDA
San Diego Supercomputer Center,
University of California, San Diego
Michalis Faloutsos
University of California, Riverside
kc claffy
Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis - CAIDA
San Diego Supercomputer Center,
University of California, San Diego
Since the emergence of peer-to-peer (P2P) networking in the
late '90s, P2P applications have multiplied, evolved and established
themselves as the leading 'growth app' of Internet
traffic workload. In contrast to first-generation P2P networks
which used well-defined port numbers, current P2P
applications have the ability to disguise their existence through
the use of arbitrary ports. As a result, reliable estimates of
P2P traffic require examination of packet payload, a methodological
landmine from legal, privacy, technical, logistic, and
fiscal perspectives. Indeed, access to user payload is often
rendered impossible by one of these factors, inhibiting trustworthy
estimation of P2P traffic growth and dynamics. In
this paper, we develop a systematic methodology to identify
P2P flows at the transport layer, i.e., based on connection
patterns of P2P networks, and without relying on packet
payload. We believe our approach is the first method for
characterizing P2P traffic using only knowledge of network
dynamics rather than any user payload. To evaluate our
methodology, we also develop a payload technique for P2P
traffic identification, by reverse engineering and analyzing
the nine most popular P2P protocols, and demonstrate its
efficacy with the discovery of P2P protocols in our traces
that were previously unknown to us. Finally, our results
indicate that P2P traffic continues to grow unabatedly, contrary
to reports in the popular media.
|
|