Router Naming Convention for colt.net, 201603

Regular Expressions:

1. ^([a-z]+5)-\d+-\d+-.+-([a-z]+\d+\.[a-z]+\.router\.[a-z]+)\.colt\.net$
2. ^(gi0)-\d+-(\d+)-\d+-[^\.]+\.([a-z]+\.router)\.colt\.net$
3. ^[a-z\d]+-([a-z\d]+)-[^-]+-[^\.]+\.([a-z]+)\.colt\.net$
4. ^[a-z]+\d+-\d+-\d+-[a-z\d]+-\d+-[a-z\d]+\.[a-z\d]+\.([a-z]+\.[a-z]+)\.colt\.net$
5. ^[a-z]+\d+-\d+-\d+-[^\.]+\.([a-z]+)\..+\.colt\.net$
6. ^[a-z]+\d+-\d+-([^\.]+\.[a-z]+\..+)\.colt\.net$
7. ^[a-z\d]+-\d+-[^-]+\.([^\.]+\.[a-z]+)\.colt\.net$
8. ^[a-z]+\d+-(.+ar\d+\.[a-z]+\.router)\.colt\.net$

Statistics:

• Training routers with at least two clustered interfaces: 63
• Positive Predictive Value: 0.749
• True Positives (green): 293
• False Positives (red): 98
• IP literals extracted (red): 0
• False Negatives, identifier extracted (orange): 17
• False Negatives, not matched: 827
• Training routers with a single interface in suffix: 65

Legend:

Evaluation against training data: