Archipelago Monitor Statistics

Archipelago (Ark): CAIDA's active measurement infrastructure serving the network research community since 2007.
Statistical information for the topology traces taken by this individual Ark monitor is displayed below. See the main statistics page for the full list of monitors

---

Prev monitor: hlz2-nz
Prev in JP: nrt3-jp
Prev in Asia: hkg5-cn

Next monitor: hnl-us
Next in JP: nrt-jp
Next in Asia: ixc-in

To main statistics page

hnd-jp

IIJ Research Lab
Tokyo, JP (3)
IPv4 data used (switch to IPv6)

Time range	2024-04-14 01:36 to 09:42 UTC (8 hours) (1 day ago)
Total traces	79500
Traces with responding destinations	9426 (11.857%)
ASes with responding destinations	1485 (17.965% out of 8266)
Prefixes with responding destinations	5799 (15.752% out of 36815)
Protocol version	v4 (switch to v6)

Generated for cycle 11446 on 2024-04-15 12:51 UTC

All images can be clicked on for more detailed information.

Median RTT per country and US state

Mapping RTT by political boundaries can reveal where high latency issues are located.

• Median RTT per country and US state
  

Path Dispersion

The paths taken by different traces show where the majority of a monitor's traffic travels.

• AS Path Dispersion (by AS Hop)
  
  AS connectivity near monitor
  
• AS Path Dispersion (by IP Hop)
  
  AS connectivity near monitor (with IP hop distances preserved)
  
• IP Path Dispersion (by IP Hop)
  
  IP connectivity near monitor
  

Path Length Distributions

Path length distributions show, on aggregate, how well-connected a monitor is to the rest of the Internet.

• CCDF of IP path lengths for responding destinations

  percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th	Max
  IP path length	10	13	15	17	20	38

  
• CCDF of AS path lengths for responding destinations

  percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th	Max
  AS path length	3	3	4	5	6	10

  
• CCDF of IP path lengths for non-responding destinations

  percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th	Max
  IP path length	6	8	11	14	18	41

  
• CCDF of AS path lengths for non-responding destinations

  percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th	Max
  AS path length	2	3	3	4	5	11

  

RTT Distribution

An RTT distribution shows the general latency between a monitor and the rest of the Internet.

• CCDF of destination RTTs

  percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th
  RTT (ms)	45.555	105.958	173.239	259.908	285.493

  
• RTT quartiles vs hop distance
  

RTTs vs. Distance

Comparing RTT with geographical distance helps show if latency is primarily due to distance or other factors.

• RTT density versus geographical distance
  
• RTT quartiles versus geographical distance