Archipelago (Ark): CAIDA's active measurement infrastructure serving the network research community since 2007.

|   Ark Home Page    The Ark Platform    Topology Datasets    Have you received an Ark probe?   |

|   Ark Monitors:    Hosting an Ark Monitor    Locations    Data Coverage    Statistics   |

---

Prev monitor: lwc3-us

Prev in US: lwc3-us

Prev in North America: lwc3-us

Next monitor: med-co

Next in US: mnz-us

Next in North America: mnz-us

To main statistics page

mdw-us

Univ. Ilinois at Chicago

Chicago, IL, US (68)

Time range	2020-08-08 19:43 to 2020-08-09 05:02 UTC (9 hours) (1 day ago)
Total traces	88500
Traces with responding destinations	11239 (12.699%)
ASes with responding destinations	1708 (19.562% out of 8731)
Prefixes with responding destinations	6571 (16.962% out of 38740)
Protocol version	v4

Generated for cycle 8678 on 2020-08-10 11:07 UTC

All images can be clicked on for more detailed information.

Median RTT per country and US state

Mapping RTT by political boundaries can reveal where high latency issues are located.

• Median RTT per country and US state
  

Path Dispersion

The paths taken by different traces show where the majority of a monitor's traffic travels.

• AS Path Dispersion (by AS Hop)
  
  AS connectivity near monitor
  
• AS Path Dispersion (by IP Hop)
  
  AS connectivity near monitor (with IP hop distances preserved)
  
• IP Path Dispersion (by IP Hop)
  
  IP connectivity near monitor
  

Path Length Distributions

Path length distributions show, on aggregate, how well-connected a monitor is to the rest of the Internet.

• CCDF of IP path lengths for responding destinations

  percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th	Max
  IP path length	15	17	19	22	23	34

  
• CCDF of AS path lengths for responding destinations

  percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th	Max
  AS path length	5	5	6	7	8	15

  
• CCDF of IP path lengths for non-responding destinations

  percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th	Max
  IP path length	10	13	16	19	22	38

  
• CCDF of AS path lengths for non-responding destinations

  percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th	Max
  AS path length	4	5	5	6	7	14

  

RTT Distribution

An RTT distribution shows the general latency between a monitor and the rest of the Internet.

• CCDF of destination RTTs

  percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th
  RTT (ms)	37.357	75.443	143.359	215.868	260.233

  
• RTT quartiles vs hop distance
  

RTTs vs. Distance

Comparing RTT with geographical distance helps show if latency is primarily due to distance or other factors.

• RTT density versus geographical distance
  
• RTT quartiles versus geographical distance