Archipelago Monitor Statistics

Archipelago (Ark): CAIDA's active measurement infrastructure serving the network research community since 2007.
Statistical information for the topology traces taken by this individual Ark monitor is displayed below. See the main statistics page for the full list of monitors

---

Prev monitor: lke3-us
Prev in US: lke3-us
Prev in North America: lke3-us

Next monitor: lun-zm
Next in US: lwc-us
Next in North America: lwc-us

To main statistics page

lnk-us

University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Lincoln, NE, US (126)

Time range	2025-04-25 05:29 to 10:17 UTC (5 hours) (1 day ago)
Total traces	42000
Traces with responding destinations	4787 (11.398%)
ASes with responding destinations	930 (16.881% out of 5509)
Prefixes with responding destinations	3284 (14.305% out of 22957)
Protocol version	v4

Generated for cycle 12811 on 2025-04-26 11:00 UTC

All images can be clicked on for more detailed information.

Median RTT per country and US state

Mapping RTT by political boundaries can reveal where high latency issues are located.

• Median RTT per country and US state

Path Dispersion

The paths taken by different traces show where the majority of a monitor's traffic travels.

• AS Path Dispersion (by AS Hop)
  
  AS connectivity near monitor
  
• AS Path Dispersion (by IP Hop)
  
  AS connectivity near monitor (with IP hop distances preserved)
  
• IP Path Dispersion (by IP Hop)
  
  IP connectivity near monitor
  

Path Length Distributions

Path length distributions show, on aggregate, how well-connected a monitor is to the rest of the Internet.

• CCDF of IP path lengths for responding destinations

  percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th	Max
  IP path length	13	14	17	19	21	29

  
• CCDF of AS path lengths for responding destinations

  percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th	Max
  AS path length	5	6	6	7	8	13

  
• CCDF of IP path lengths for non-responding destinations

  percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th	Max
  IP path length	9	10	13	16	18	41

  
• CCDF of AS path lengths for non-responding destinations

  percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th	Max
  AS path length	4	4	5	6	7	13

  

RTT Distribution

An RTT distribution shows the general latency between a monitor and the rest of the Internet.

• CCDF of destination RTTs

  percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th
  RTT (ms)	46.249	65.020	142.305	193.451	250.537

  
• RTT quartiles vs hop distance
  

RTTs vs. Distance

Comparing RTT with geographical distance helps show if latency is primarily due to distance or other factors.

• RTT density versus geographical distance
  
• RTT quartiles versus geographical distance