Archipelago Monitor Statistics

Archipelago (Ark): CAIDA's active measurement infrastructure serving the network research community since 2007.
Statistical information for the topology traces taken by this individual Ark monitor is displayed below. See the main statistics page for the full list of monitors

---

Prev monitor: scq-es
Prev in IL: tlv3-il
Prev in Asia: pbh2-bt

Next monitor: sea2-us
Next in IL: tlv-il
Next in Asia: sin2-sg

To main statistics page

sdv-il

Tel Aviv Univ.
Ramat Aviv, IL (3)
IPv4 data used (switch to IPv6)

Time range	2020-06-16 22:55 to 23:26 UTC (1 hour) (1402 days ago)
Total traces	6000
Traces with responding destinations	744 (12.400%)
ASes with responding destinations	259 (16.137% out of 1605)
Prefixes with responding destinations	631 (14.060% out of 4488)
Protocol version	v4 (switch to v6)

Generated for cycle 8537 on 2021-05-05 10:36 UTC

All images can be clicked on for more detailed information.

Median RTT per country and US state

Mapping RTT by political boundaries can reveal where high latency issues are located.

• Median RTT per country and US state
  

Path Dispersion

The paths taken by different traces show where the majority of a monitor's traffic travels.

• AS Path Dispersion (by AS Hop)
  
  AS connectivity near monitor
  
• AS Path Dispersion (by IP Hop)
  
  AS connectivity near monitor (with IP hop distances preserved)
  
• IP Path Dispersion (by IP Hop)
  
  IP connectivity near monitor
  

Path Length Distributions

Path length distributions show, on aggregate, how well-connected a monitor is to the rest of the Internet.

• CCDF of IP path lengths for responding destinations

  percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th	Max
  IP path length	9	11	14	16	20	29

  
• CCDF of AS path lengths for responding destinations

  percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th	Max
  AS path length	4	6	6	7	8	11

  
• CCDF of IP path lengths for non-responding destinations

  percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th	Max
  IP path length	6	8	11	14	17	31

  
• CCDF of AS path lengths for non-responding destinations

  percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th	Max
  AS path length	3	5	6	6	7	12

  

RTT Distribution

An RTT distribution shows the general latency between a monitor and the rest of the Internet.

• CCDF of destination RTTs

  percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th
  RTT (ms)	89.063	125.266	219.776	309.668	348.611

  
• RTT quartiles vs hop distance
  

RTTs vs. Distance

Comparing RTT with geographical distance helps show if latency is primarily due to distance or other factors.

• RTT density versus geographical distance
  
• RTT quartiles versus geographical distance