Address administration in IPv6
Eric Hoffman and k claffy
As the Internet begins to enter the popular scope, portending large
scale changes in how society will operate, important questions have
emerged regarding issues of fairness and responsibility with respect to
several aspects of the base Internet architecture.
The questions are many, and all have cumbersome legal, financial, and
cultural ramifications. We focus here on only one: the addressing
model. Addresses are the technical cornerstone of the Internet's
ability to move data from sender to any connected receiver. The shape
of the address space ultimately determines the effective scalability
and constrains the financial model of the network. We contrast two
models of address assignment, provider and geographic based, expanding
on Tsuchiya's analysis [10], and explore their ramifications.
One difficulty in discussing address space is that although its
effective use is essential for the technical feasibility of Internet
operation, the ownership of address space and the responsibility for
justifying its use remain ill-defined. There are several revealing
analogies in other spheres, e.g., spectrum assignment and international
telephony. Like spectrum bands, IP address space is a finite and
contended resource that requires careful assignment and management. We
note also that it has been, and continues to be, particularly
challenging for regulatory bodies to create and enforce equitable and
consistent policies for spectrum allocation.
Internet addressing policy must be constructed out of a careful balance among:
- service requirements of end users
- base technology of the network
- cost effectiveness of service provision
- ability of providers to regain infrastructure costs
- use of the Internet as a fundamental technology of society as a the phone system
Although the IETF has entertained discussion of addressing policy
including all of the above issues, the Internet has reached a stage of
maturity and breadth of scope that requires wider debate of these
issues.