Archipelago Monitor Statistics

Archipelago (Ark): CAIDA's active measurement infrastructure serving the network research community since 2007.
Statistical information for the topology traces taken by this individual Ark monitor is displayed below. See the main statistics page for the full list of monitors

yto-ca

Vultr
Toronto, CA (7)
IPv6 data used (switch to IPv4)

Time range	2026-03-22 22:06 to 2026-03-24 15:42 UTC (1 day 18 hours) (2 days ago)
Total traces	484330
Traces with responding destinations	48863 (10.089%)
ASes with responding destinations	12790 (35.437% out of 36092)
Prefixes with responding destinations	43414 (18.522% out of 234392)
Protocol version	v6 (switch to v4)

Generated for cycle 20260322 on 2026-03-25 10:54 UTC

All images can be clicked on for more detailed information.

Median RTT per country and US state

Mapping RTT by political boundaries can reveal where high latency issues are located.

Median RTT per country and US state

Path Dispersion

The paths taken by different traces show where the majority of a monitor's traffic travels.

AS Path Dispersion (by AS Hop)

AS connectivity near monitor

AS Path Dispersion (by IP Hop)

AS connectivity near monitor (with IP hop distances preserved)

IP Path Dispersion (by IP Hop)

IP connectivity near monitor

Path Length Distributions

Path length distributions show, on aggregate, how well-connected a monitor is to the rest of the Internet.

CCDF of IP path lengths for responding destinations


percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th	Max
IP path length	11	13	16	19	21	38

CCDF of AS path lengths for responding destinations


percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th	Max
AS path length	3	3	4	5	6	12

CCDF of IP path lengths for non-responding destinations

percentile 10th 25th 50th 75th 90th Max

IP path length 9 12 15 18 21 45
CCDF of AS path lengths for non-responding destinations

percentile 10th 25th 50th 75th 90th Max

AS path length 2 2 3 4 5 16

RTT Distribution

An RTT distribution shows the general latency between a monitor and the rest of the Internet.

CCDF of destination RTTs

percentile 10th 25th 50th 75th 90th

RTT (ms) 19.370 60.621 105.622 167.008 246.677
RTT quartiles vs hop distance


percentile	10th	25th	50th	75th	90th
RTT (ms)	19.370	60.621	105.622	167.008	246.677

RTTs vs. Distance

Comparing RTT with geographical distance helps show if latency is primarily due to distance or other factors.

RTT density versus geographical distance
RTT quartiles versus geographical distance