NLANR cache hierarchy statistics,
visualization, and roi
8 feb 98
nlanr cache pi: Duane Wessels
wessels@nlanr.net
data analysis: Alex Rousskov
rousskov@nlanr.net
we have not inherited the Earth from our parents;
we have borrowed it from our children
-- World Conservation Strategy, Grand Canyon newspaper, july 90
NLANR cache hierarchy statistics,
visualization, and roi
8 feb 98
nlanr cache pi: Duane Wessels
wessels@nlanr.net
data analysis: Alex Rousskov
rousskov@nlanr.net
-
we have not inherited the Earth from our parents;
we have borrowed it from our children
| aggregate statistics |
daily traffic per NLANR caches (bytes and documents)
daily traffic NLANR supercache
11 NLANR caches, off and on:BO, CH, DC, IT,
LJ, PA, PB,
SD, SJ, SV,
UC. cumulative traffic ( 1 webit = O(10TB) )
savings (doc, byte hit ratios) over course of project
supercache daily savings
absolute daily savings
cumulative savings
cumulative supercache savings (almost 1 webit)
note superlinear growth of saving rate.
| hierarchy statistics |
(more recently collected) hierarchy analysis
direct fetch, remote miss
local hits, remote hits
Note SJ cache has no remote hits and misses.
| per-type statistics |
absolute traffic (BO, (PB's stats similar)
doc types of 5% or more of intensity or volume
images largest category
but which documents most cache-valuable?
relative contribution per traffic category
per-type savings (images well ahead)
cumulative per-type savings
executables in 2nd place,
but low hit ratio reduces their caching efficacy
return on investment
9 feb 98, alex/kc, info@caida.org.

